The Daily Parker

A three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade has granted summary judgment to a group of states and organizations, ruling that the OAFPOTUS's reliance on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 is unconstitutional, and thus nearly all of the administration's tariffs are unlawful:

On Wednesday, the Court of International Trade, the primary federal legal body overseeing such matters, found that Mr. Trump’s tariffs “exceed any authority granted” to the president by the emergency powers law. Ruling in separate cases brought by states and businesses, a bipartisan panel of three judges essentially declared many, but not all, of Mr. Trump’s tariffs to have been issued illegally.

It was not clear precisely when and how the tariff collections would grind to a halt. The ruling gave the executive branch up to 10 days to complete the bureaucratic process of ending them. The Trump administration immediately filed its plans to appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

A White House spokesman, Kush Desai, sharply rebuked the court, saying ... “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency.”

The USCIT agrees with you, Mr Desai: Congress should decide how to properly address tariffs. And there is no emergency.

There were, naturally, a few reactions this morning.

Krugman: "Is there a dignified legal way, preferably in Latin, to say 'Holy Shit?' ... [I]t has been obvious all along that Trump’s use of the 1977 International Economic Emergency Powers Act to justify Smoot-Hawley level tariffs was a massive abuse of power. I mean, since when are 4 percent unemployment and 2.5 percent inflation an emergency justifying the reversal of 90 years of policy?"

Marshall: "So is this all over? I suspect it may be. There are laws which grant the President the power to impose tariffs for specific reasons. But this particular law doesn’t even mention tariffs as something the President can do under this act. So I don’t think as a legal matter it’s a terribly close call."

Zoe Williams: "The observer could file all this under 'government: harder than it looks.' Moving fast and breaking things doesn’t work. Borrowing and spending while slashing and burning in a formless, ad hoc fashion doesn’t work. Billionaires with fragile egos, trying to cooperate while reserving the right to say whatever they like about each other, well, this has never worked. It would be the gravest imaginable mistake, though, to think that just because the wheels are coming off it this bus is losing its destructive power."

I'm surprised to discover, however, that none of my other usual suspects reacted. "Flooding the zone with shit" does work, to an extent, because they can produce alarming quantities of feculence quickly. But so far, the OAFPOTUS has lost every one of his major initiatives in court. Well, district court, and one or two circuit courts of appeal. We have a long way to go before the bus actually stops moving.

On some days, I have more meetings than others. Today was a more extreme example, with meetings for 6 of the 8½ hours I put in. Somehow I also managed to read some documentation and get some other things accomplished. I also can't say that any of the meetings was a waste of time, either. Welcome back to management.

Unfortunately, that meant I could only put these stories in a queue so I can read them now:

• William Finnegan wonders if he or Homeland Security Secretary Kristi "Dead Puppies" Noem is brain-damaged.
• Chicago's animal shelters report a surge in surrenders as people discover pets cost a lot of money (I'm looking at you, Cassie).
• Does it make sense for the CDC to recommend that healthy children and pregnant women not get a covid booster? Yes, with some pretty big caveats, and a reminder that corruption and incompetence make it really hard to trust what comes out of the executive branch these days.
• With only a couple of days left until the Illinois legislature lets public transit in Chicago fall off a cliff, a bill is slouching towards the governor's desk to reorganize our multiple transit agencies into one big one.

OK, Cassie is sitting next to me and staring into my eyes with an intense "feed me" vibe, so off I go. I really hope I have fewer meetings tomorrow.

Cassie spent yesterday morning at the local veterinary oncology clinic getting poked. The ultrasound looked good, so we're just waiting for results from her spleen and lymph cytology. They said she was a model patient, although they did give her a light sedative so she wouldn't squirm during the ultrasound.

And for the next couple of weeks she'll have a naked belly:

The sedative had quite an amusing effect. I've only seen her stoned once before. Yesterday she acted more like she'd just come from a Playing Dead ("No, man! Play Floyd!") concert than the inert blob she was last time.

More info when the cytology comes back. Plus all the news stories that have accumulated while I've been in meetings all day.

The OAFPOTUS is blatantly selling pardons now:

[Paul] Walczak, a former nursing home executive who had pleaded guilty to tax crimes days after the 2024 election, submitted a pardon application to President Trump around Inauguration Day. The application focused not solely on Mr. Walczak’s offenses but also on the political activity of his mother, Elizabeth Fago.

Ms. Fago had raised millions of dollars for Mr. Trump’s campaigns and those of other Republicans, the application said. It also highlighted her connections to an effort to sabotage Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s 2020 campaign by publicizing the addiction diary of his daughter Ashley Biden — an episode that drew law enforcement scrutiny.

[W]eeks went by and no pardon was forthcoming, even as Mr. Trump issued clemency grants to hundreds of other allies.

Then, Ms. Fago was invited to a $1-million-per-person fund-raising dinner last month that promised face-to-face access to Mr. Trump at his private Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Fla.

Less than three weeks after she attended the dinner, Mr. Trump signed a full and unconditional pardon.

Imagine if any other president had done this—and I mean, any other president—he'd be impeached and convicted by the end of June.

The Republican Party has embraced corruption in all its forms. Selling a pardon doesn't even make them blink.

Like yesterday, today I took Cassie somewhere she'd never been before, giving her an amazing array of new smells and rodents to chase. We went up to the Green Bay Trail in Winnetka, covering just under 5 km, and passing a somewhat-recognizable house along the way:

We'll spend more time outside today, though it really hasn't warmed up yet (current temperature: 15°C). She doesn't mind.

Cassie and I took an hour-long walk through the LaBagh Woods and Forest Glen this afternoon:

It's still a very nice day, so I might have to take her on another half-hour walk soon.

The OAFPOTUS signed a batch of executive orders yesterday announcing the administration's support for building more nuclear power, a policy that on its face sounds great:

One order directs the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the nation’s independent safety regulator, to streamline its rules and to take no more than 18 months to approve applications for new reactors. The order also urges the agency to consider lowering its safety limits for radiation exposure, saying that current rules go beyond what is needed to protect human health.

The Trump administration also set a goal of quadrupling the size of the nation’s fleet of nuclear power plants, from nearly 100 gigawatts of electric capacity today to 400 gigawatts by 2050. One gigawatt is enough to power nearly 1 million homes.

In recent years, more than a dozen companies have begun developing a new generation of smaller reactors a fraction of the size of those at Vogtle [a plant under construction in Georgia]. The hope is that these reactors would have a lower upfront price tag, making them a less risky investment for utilities. They might also be based on a design that could be repeated often, as opposed to custom-built, to reduce costs.

OK, so what's the problem? Nuclear power is cleaner and safer than fossil-fuel power, especially over the long term. Despite disasters in Ukraine (1986) and Japan (2011), civilian nuclear power has killed orders of magnitude fewer people than coal mining and emissions from fossil-fuel power generation, for example.

So why am I skeptical? Because I don't trust the OAFPOTUS to tell me the time of day without trying to steal my watch, let alone to pass a major policy initiative on the merits. It's telling that the signing event included comments about building small-scale reactors to power crypto mining, for example. And given the thoroughly demonstrated lack of competence in the administration, and their desire to destroy the regulatory state entirely, I worry that the lack of oversight will lead to a nuclear disaster that will set the industry back another few decades. (Remember, a spectacular accident that kills 10 people is far scarier to most of us apes than the ongoing loss of millions of years of human lifespans from fossil-fuel pollution and resource extraction.)

I'm willing to give the administration and the Republican party support when they do the right thing. But their behavior over the last 10 years has been to (a) design policies to enrich themselves instead of providing for the general welfare and (b) screw up the implementation, whether through incompetence or malice, to render them worse than doing nothing. I hope this nuclear initiative will work out, or at least give my party some runway to fix it when we return to power. Yet neither the OAFPOTUS nor the Republican Party as a whole fill me with confidence that this time will be different.

Today's theme—in fact, almost every day's theme on the Daily Parker lately—is a group doing one thing that freaks everyone out to distract from the other thing that they really want to do. For instance:

• In the middle of passing the biggest wealth transfer from the poor to the rich in American history, Republicans are lying about the plight of the working class being all Obama's fault. Because of course they are, and of course it isn't.
• Even though the OAFPOTUS is attacking Harvard to take attention away from the biggest wealth transfer from the poor to the rich in American history, the assault on the country's oldest university is "an astonishing act of national self-sabotage," writes Yascha Mounk.
• Michelle Singletary explains how the "no tax on tips" provision in the bill proposing the biggest wealth transfer from the poor to the rich in American history will function to make the lives of lower-wage employees worse, while enriching gig companies like Uber at their expense. For example, if it becomes law, Uber will immediately move their workers to a tip-only structure and lower ride costs, simultaneously taking a bigger chunk of the ride revenue for the company while lowering the amount that riders tip. Sucks to be an Uber driver if that happens. (Even more than it does already.)
• ProPublica explains the nonsense coming out of the administration about "invasion," and why Stephen Miller is spending so much energy on this fringe legal theory, even as Congress is passing the biggest wealth transfer from the poor to the rich in American history.

Did I mention that the House voted at 1am yesterday to impoverish more Americans and create more billionaires with their money than has ever happened in the United States?

Keep this in mind when you vote in 18 months and for the rest of your lives: The unprecedented—and I'm including Harding and Reagan here—corruption and outright theft of your money that the Republican Party are perpetrating on the United States is the culmination of a 60-year program that started when Ronald Reagan was Governor of California. They have been working on this since 1964. I am not exaggerating. So the next time a Republican tells you they have a plan to help the working class or to bring "good jobs" back or whatever lie they're telling you, remember how they have used the power voters have given them.

And if you're a MAGA Republican, take a good hard look at what they're doing to you, even while you're cheering the cruelty they're inflicting on everyone you hate.

Spot the moment when I removed the Inner Drive Technology WHQ outdoor weather station from its repurposed birdhouse:

It lives in a birdhouse to protect it from the sun, rain, and (ironically) birds. However, when we have a long stretch of really humid air as we had for most of the week, the birdhouse gets a bit stuffy. I thought that might be the case when the closest other Netatmo weather station showed a much more reasonable temperature-dewpoint spread all day.

So, no, it's not still raining. In fact it's quite pleasant outside, as Cassie and I will soon experience. But my poor Netatmo sensor was feeling a bit clammy.

First, there is no update on Cassie. She had a quick consult today, but they didn't schedule the actual diagnostics that she needs, so we'll go back first thing Tuesday. She does have a small mast cell tumor on her head, but the location makes her oncologist optimistic for treatment. I'll post again next week after the results come back from her spleen and lymph node aspirations.

Meanwhile, in the real world, things lurch forward and backward as the OAFPOTUS's political trajectory slides by millimeters towards Buchanan levels of popularity and effectiveness:

• Jen Rubin sounds yet another alarm, pointing out that charging your political opponents with bullshit crimes makes you a fascist.
• In a fragile but important win for the First Amendment, Justice Amy Coney Barrett (R) recused herself from two Oklahoma cases, which allowed the Oklahoma Supreme Court's decision barring publicly-funded religious schools to stand. (Because the per curiam order was unsigned, it's not clear who cast the 4th vote to affirm; my money's on Chief Justice Roberts (R).)
• Nicholas Kristof suggests three ways that we can undermine the OAFPOTUS's autocratic project.
• The Chicago City Council agreed to $87.9 million more in settlements stemming from police brutality over the years, while the police union does nothing to prevent it.
• A bill working its way through the Illinois legislature would require companies to provide an itemized list of fees before a purchase in an attempt to curb "junk fees."

I took half a day off of work because I didn't know how long Cassie's appointment would take, so after my 4pm meeting I will sod off for the rest of the day. There will be much walkies and much patting of the dog starting around 4:30.