I just have to sigh heavily when I read crap like this. New Scientist is reporting today on a "lab" in Redmond, Wash., where the "scientists" are trying to find evidence against Darwin:
The message is clear. If ID supporters can bolster their case by citing more experimental research, another judge at some future date might conclude that ID does qualify as science, and is therefore a legitimate topic for discussion in American science classrooms. This is precisely the kind of scientific respectability that research at the Biologic Institute is attempting to provide. "We need all the input we can get in the sciences," [former Biologic, Inc., director] Weber told [New Scientist]. "What we are doing is necessary to move ID along."
Riiiight.
Even an atheist like me can see the divine in the beauty and elegance of natural selection theory. Why do these people need the hand of god to create every piece of their world? Are they so wrapped up in the specific theology that they miss the deeper meaning of it?
dasBlog theme by Mads Kristensen
Watch Parker, um, sleep whenever I remember to point the camera at him. Updated every 60 seconds.
Only 59 days, 21 hours, and 34 minutes remain until the Obama Administration.
All content Copyright ©2008 David Braverman. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer This blog contains the personal opinions of David Braverman and, where applicable, guest bloggers.